Red State, Blue State
Conservatives took over Maine during the midterm election. Or did they?
- By: Colin Woodard
Overnight, Maine Turns Red,” declared the headline at the New York Times, the day after the November 2 midterm election, in which Republicans took control of the governor’s mansion and both chambers of the state legislature for the first time since 1962.
Paul LePage, a social conservative with Tea Party backing, had edged out his independent rival — and destroyed his Democratic one — on a promise to slash taxes, spending, public services, and regulations. Despite having adopted a party platform pledging to seal the borders, refuse federal stimulus money, and shut down the federal Department of Education, the state G.O.P. had captured the state Senate (as expected) and the House (which surprised virtually everyone). The Democrats’ eight-year lock on state government had come to an end.
Mainers, it seemed at first blush, had taken a hard turn to the right just two years after giving Barack Obama victory in fifteen of the state’s sixteen counties. The national commentariat started writing moderate Republican Senator Olympia Snowe’s political obituary, predicting she would be unable to win her party’s primary now that Mainers had shown a willingness to elect a conservative Republican to statewide office.
Or had they?
Southern and midcoast Maine voters had also chosen liberal Democratic Congresswoman Chellie Pingree — who supported health-care reform, the stimulus package, and efforts to address global warming — over conservative Republican challenger Dean Scontras by a 57 to 43 percent margin. Voters in “the other Maine” chose another Democrat, Congressman Mike Michaud over another conservative, Jason Levesque, 55 to 45 percent, who ran on a “government is the problem” platform.
“Pingree and Michaud won overwhelmingly in fundamentally two-way blue vs. red races,” says state Representative Seth Berry (D-Bowdoinham), the outgoing majority whip. “But the governor’s race was much more muddied by the presence of other candidates.”
Though victorious, Mr. LePage actually received less support than either Mr. Scontras or Mr. Levesque — just 38 percent. Nearly two-thirds of Maine voters had voted for someone else, with 37 percent backing independent Eliot Cutler, a centrist who started the race with neither name recognition nor a party machine, but won the endorsement of every daily newspaper in the state, save the Biddeford Journal. (It endorsed Democrat Libby Mitchell, a thirty-six-year veteran of the state legislature, who got just 19 percent of the vote.)
“The top of the ticket races would indicate that maybe Maine is a blue state, but that in the governor’s race the blues attacked each other, enabling a red win,” says Ron Schmidt, chair of the Political Science department at the University of Southern Maine.
“It’s sort of like the 2000 [presidential] election, where if Nader hadn’t been on the ballot in Florida, Gore would have won,” adds Colby College government professor Sandy Maisel. “Quite frankly, if Mitchell had not been on the ballot, Cutler would have won.”
Mainers also endorsed both bond issues on the ballot, granting permission for the state to borrow more than $23 million to invest in dental clinics, dental education, conservation land, and the preservation of working waterfronts. In June, primary voters also approved another four borrowing measures, most of them by margins that almost certainly included many LePage supporters. If the Tea Party movement’s focus on shrinking deficits and the reach of government had caught on with a majority of Mainers, they’ve had a funny way of showing it.
“I don’t think Maine has shifted hard to the right,” says Representative Pingree, one of the only Congressional Democrats in the entire country to actually increase her electoral support compared to 2008. “Maine proved itself to truly be an unpredictable swing state where voters like to make up their minds and don’t like to be told what to do.”
Robert Monks, Sr., credited with mentoring Bill Cohen’s career in the state as G.O.P. chair in the 1970s, agrees, noting that Mainers repeatedly elected Snowe and fellow Republican Senator Susan Collins over the past fifteen years, even as they put Democrats in control of most everything else. “Honest to God, you really have to conclude that Maine voters know what they’re doing,” he says. “They think, they apply discretion, and they are voting for individuals. And I say, hurrah!”
That said, the election swept Democrats from Augusta, clearing the way for Republicans to enact their agenda unimpeded. What’s not clear is what sort of agenda Maine Republicans are agreed upon.
Their infamous Tea Party-inspired platform demands a return to “Austrian economics” and “the process of assimilation of immigrants” and prohibitions on same sex marriage, abortion, “political correctness,” and “any participation in efforts to create a one world government.” Investigations into “collusion between government and industry in the global warming myth” are to be launched, and “obstacles created by government to allow private development of . . . natural gas, oil, coal, and nuclear power” lifted.
Prominent Republicans dismiss the platform — which was passed in May by an overwhelming majority of the party’s state convention delegates — as an irrelevant aberration. “I think to some people it’s an important document, and to others it’s the product of a convention battle,” says outgoing House minority leader Josh Tardy (R-Newport). “Nobody has told me about the inner workings of the plan for a one world government, so our focus is going to be on jobs and the economy.”
“We’ll have to wait and see if the Maine Republican Party is going to govern like its platform indicates, or if it will maintain the Maine tradition of a fairly practical approach to policy making,” says USM’s Schmidt. “LePage seems fairly committed to a very conservative agenda.”
On the campaign trail, LePage pledged to reduce the cost of health insurance by allowing insurers to not cover pre-existing conditions, to lower energy costs by constructing nuclear power plants, and to institute a flat income tax that would represent a windfall for Maine’s wealthiest citizens. He promises to ferret out alleged waste and abuse, to audit every government regulation to see if it is “costing us new job opportunities,” and to impose a lifetime limit of five years in welfare benefits, after which he “will personally buy [recipients] a ticket to Massachusetts so they can start over.”
Colby’s Maisel, a one-time Democratic Congressional candidate, fears the worst. “I think we’ll see huge cuts in state regulations and employees. He’ll take the environmental agencies and consolidate them and strip them of power, and will do the same for health coverage and welfare payments,” he says. “Those who feared LePage would win didn’t expect the Democrats to lose the House. I had a friend who voted for LePage because he ‘wanted to blow up Augusta.’ Now he just might be able to.”
For all of LePage’s bravado on the campaign trail — he promised one audience that once in office he would regularly be in the headlines telling “Obama to go to hell” — Republican leaders were signaling a desire to work from the center.
“Paul says you have to respect the views expressed on platforms, but you’ve got to govern for everybody,” says LePage’s spokesman, Dan Demeritt. “This is not a victory lap, not ‘our way or the highway,’ ” he adds. “He’s going to govern and reach accommodation in a thoughtful and inclusive way, involving as many people as we can regardless of party.”
Incoming Senate President Kevin Raye (R-Perry) notes that most Republican legislators won by talking about the need for regulatory reform to jump-start small businesses, rather than anything in the party’s platform. “I’ve visited countless small businesses and I own one” — Raye’s Mustard in Eastport — “and you hear exactly the same conversation everywhere you go,” he says. “Maine is so severely over-regulated that you spend time doing paperwork and trying to keep ahead of the regulations imposed on your industry rather than concentrating on what it is your business actually does.” No wonder, he says, that Maine ranked last in Forbes magazine’s latest annual survey of the “Best States for Business.”
“I want to make sure we don’t fall victim to what the Democrats did nationally, which is overreaching,” Raye concludes. “I don’t think voters are looking to lurch from one extreme to the other. They’re looking to see common sense and progress on Maine’s debt load, budget, and economy.” An early indication that firebrands are not calling the shots: G.O.P legislators spurned their favorites to elect Raye and moderate Republican Representative Robert Nutting to the top leadership posts of the Senate and House respectively.
Nobody knows just how the Tea Party crowd will react should the newly elected Republicans turn out to be reformers rather than revolutionaries. Tea Party activist Andrew Ian Dodge — a libertarian with little love for LePage or the G.O.P. platform — says the Republicans shouldn’t take the movement’s support for granted. “All of us are giving LePage the benefit of the doubt, but it will be interesting to see how long his non-fanatical supporters will give him before they turn on him,” he says.
Still, an agenda along the lines Raye proposes may suffice. “Many want LePage to get government the hell out of the way, reducing taxation and red tape. If he does that quick, then he’ll have their eternal support,” says Dodge, a Harpswell-based science-fiction writer. “They want stuff done and now because it’s a matter of being able to stay in this state or having to leave for financial reasons or to feed their family.”
Maine’s new political leaders are also confronting a horrific $1 billion budget deficit for the next two years, one that will almost certainly require radical cuts to state programs. “This is the worst budget crisis in Maine’s history, and to get it to balance is going to require that we cut something like $300 million out of the state’s share of the Health and Human Services department,” says retiring state Senator Peter Mills (R-Cornville), a moderate who lost to LePage in the gubernatorial primary. “We’ve already cut comparable amounts in the last few years, so the only way to do that would be to cut back substantially on current services, which will rip the heart out of the social services network.” Raising taxes is impossible, he says, as there would be a people’s veto.
“The question is how to make the cuts intelligently and not kill people. It’s come to that.
“The burden of leadership is on us now, which is why I’ve been out in front to try to help,” Mills adds, noting that his party has to act competently, given the stakes.
Outgoing Democratic Governor John Baldacci agrees that the state faces a major crisis, “the worst recession since the Great Depression,” and one that will require all hands on deck. “Everybody should do their part to help the new administration be successful because we’re all in the same boat, and we need to be sure we’re all rowing in the same direction,” he says. “Mainers are looking for people willing to speak beyond the parties.”
- By: Colin Woodard









I really want to say thank
I really want to say thank you for the information you have shared. Keep writing these kind of posts and I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
maestría en España
You make so many great
You make so many great points here that I read your article a couple of times. Your views are in accordance with my own for the most part. This is great content for your readers.
Relationship with Geo Spatialla
If you want keyword ranking
If you want keyword ranking in google then you must use our bookmarking list 2013 updated and all bookmarking sites are registered so do not waste time and get good page rank.
tapetes personalizados
I would like to appreciate
I would like to appreciate your hard work you did write this post, Thanks for sharing this valuable post
topes de estacionamiento
These are some great tools
These are some great tools that i definitely use for SEO work. This is a great list to use in the future..
fat loss factor reviews
That is very good comment
That is very good comment you shared.Thank you so much that for you shared those things with us.Im wishing you to carry on with ur achievements.All the best.
Ginefiv
Great post i must say and
Great post i must say and thanks for the information. Education is definitely a sticky subject. However, is still among the leading topics of our time. I appreciate your post and look forward to more.
equipo para gimnasio
All the contents you
All the contents you mentioned in post are too good and can be very useful. I will keep it in mind, thanks for sharing the information keep updating, looking forward for more posts.
tapetes con logotipo
Thanks for taking the time
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.
electrician bakersfield
I have read your blog it is
I have read your blog it is very helpful for me. I want to say thanks to you. I have bookmark your site for future updates.
click for 3 credit reports here
I have recently started a
I have recently started a blog, the info you provide on this site has helped me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work.
Get more info about Bgendel Jabez
I really appreciate the kind
I really appreciate the kind of topics you post here. Thanks for sharing us a great information that is actually helpful. Good day!
click for 3 credit reports here
The article fails to
The article fails to identify the fundamental principle of the Tea Party, which is to return to the political philosophy which founded the constitution of the United States and of Maine.
This surprises me since Colin Woodard is a historical writer who wrote a book called "The Republic of Pirates". If he understands the governmental organization of pirates as a republic, then why is it so difficult to understand the United States is a republic which places limits the powers of government?
The article states "Nobody knows just how the Tea Party crowd will react should the newly elected Republicans turn out to be reformers rather than revolutionaries." (Of course nobody knows since the future of anything and everything is unknown.)
The founding fathers were revolutionaries - is this the meaning of the above sentence? Should "revolutionary" be identified with those that believe in the founding principles of the United States- and is "reformers" just a stand in for "progressives" those that want to "reform" the political philosophy that founded this country and continually expand the size and power of government? what greater expansion of government is there than global government- which is totalitarianism?
If the sentence above is interpreted in this way- then the question in terms of this state becomes- How will the Tea Party respond if the LePage administration and the new republican legislatures are satisfied with merely reducing regulations but do nothing to stop the rapidly expanding, entrenched, and unconstitutional structure of state capitalism that is operative in Maine -created by our legislature - and which is the oppositional to the founding principles of the United States. Le Page has said that it is not the job of government to create jobs. I hope that he means it. I guess that makes me an (American) revolutionary.
But I am not opposed to evolutionary change, if that is what it takes to keep the system in tact. There is always the question of how the rate of change should or must be applied to effect the desired result. Our country and our state are teetering on the brink of total collapse. It will not remain the same - it will either become more American or more totalitarian. This is the choice of our times.
What if
To turn Maisel's comment around, would Mitchell have beat LePage if Cutler was not on the ballot? There is no question that Cutler benefited in the last two weeks before the election from voters who didn't want LePage, and chose the candidate they thought was best placed to beat him.
Maisel on Libby
Actually, Gerald, Maisel did address that in my interview. Here's the full passage from my transcript:
"It was sort of like 2000: if Nader hadn't been on the ballot in Florida, Gore would have won. Quite frankly, if Mitchell had not been on the ballot, Cutler would have won. She [Mitchell] would have had a harder time winning [if Cutler wasn't on the ballot] because my feeling was that she was the right candidate at the wrong time. This was not the year for someone who was a career politician to be running."
I like the article's
I like the article's description of the GOP platform as "infamous". That's not a loaded word, now..........is it?
Some might thing the Democratic platform is "infamous", but we didn't really hear anything at all about IT, or what's in it, did we? Nope.
Infamous
So long as I'm responding to comments...
Jim: you need to look up the definition of "infamous." Rightly or wrongly, nobody has paid any attention to the Maine Democrats' platform. The Maine G.O.P's new platform, by contrast, is indeed infamous, in that it has been mocked and reviled by much of the national media, from The Daily Show to the Washington Post. You can agree or disagree with whether or not that's fair, but you are incorrect to call it a "loaded" term. It's a statement of fact.
You read, you decide
Better is for people to read the Maine GOP Platform themselves and let them decide how to describe it:
http://www.mainegop.com/PlatformMission.aspx
The Platform was promulgated by the same people that think the UN is trying to take over US Rte. 1 in Midcoast Maine via the ominous sounding Agenda 21:
http://www.dirigoblue.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2165
Well no......some people in
Well no......some people in the left and mainstream media were shocked by it, that's my point exactly. That makes it "infamous"? Infamous is, of course, a loaded word.